Par 3
120 scoresAvg. +0.53 / hole+0.04 / 50 yd
Ward
Handicap Index
1.7
12M Low
1.3
Nov 2025
Revised
Sep 13
2026
Index Pressure
Expected HI change over the next four rounds
-0.34
Offense
Revision Scores
| Played | Course | Score | Type | CR / Slope | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep ’26 | Interlachen Country Club | 85 | H | 75.2 / 137 | 8.1 |
| Sep ’26 | Interlachen Country Club | PCC +183 | H | 75.2 / 137 | 5.6 |
| Sep ’26 | Interlachen Country Club | 76 | H | 72.5 / 132 | 3.0 |
| Sep ’26 | Interlachen Country Club | Next80 | H | 75.2 / 137 | 4.0 |
| Sep ’26 | Interlachen Country Club | 80 | H | 72.5 / 132 | 6.4 |
| Sep ’26 | Interlachen Country Club | Low72 | H | 72.5 / 132 | +0.4 |
| Aug ’26 | Interlachen Country Club | 75 | H | 75.2 / 137 | +0.2 |
| Aug ’26 | Interlachen Country Club | 77 | H | 75.2 / 137 | 1.5 |
| Aug ’26 | Interlachen Country Club | 79 | H | 72.5 / 132 | 5.6 |
| Aug ’26 | Interlachen Country Club | High77 | H | 72.5 / 132 | 3.9 |
| Aug ’26 | Interlachen Country Club | 85 | T | 75.2 / 137 | 8.1 |
| Aug ’26 | 80 | H | 75.2 / 137 | 4.0 | |
| Aug ’26 | 80 | H | 72.5 / 132 | 6.4 | |
| Jul ’26 | 76 | H | 72.5 / 132 | 3.0 | |
| Jul ’26 | 82 | A | 72.2 / 140 | 7.9 | |
| Jul ’26 | PCC −171 | A | 72.2 / 140 | +0.2 | |
| Jul ’26 | PCC −180 | A | 72.2 / 140 | 7.1 | |
| Jul ’26 | 83 | H | 73.8 / 135 | 7.7 | |
| Jun ’26 | Interlachen Country Club | 84 | T | 75.2 / 137 | 7.3 |
| Jun ’26 | Interlachen Country Club | 79 | T | 75.2 / 137 | 3.1 |
Index and Pressure History
Index
Pressure
Scoring Rates (Rolling Avg.)
10-Round Window
8/31/26 – 9/30/26
Birdie-
8.9%
Par
56.1%
Bogey
26.1%
Double+
8.9%
Scoring to Par (Rolling Avg.)
10-Round Window
8/31/26 – 9/30/26
Total / 18
+6.4
Par 3
+0.53
Par 4
+0.40
Par 5
+0.07
Traveling Handicap
Advantage
HOME
Home edge
1.4 Strokes±2.1
Home vs. index
+2.5
30 rounds
Away vs. index
+4.0
18 rounds
Vs. Course
TeePick 2 to compare
Interlachen Country Club
Edina, US-MN
Rounds
19
Front 9+3.919 rounds
Back 9+3.519 rounds
TeePick 2 to compare
Mean95% CI
Birdie
21%
5%
0%
11%
5%
5%
11%
5%
16%
5%
5%
11%
16%
0%
5%
32%
0%
16%
Par
53%
42%
37%
63%
58%
68%
47%
32%
58%
53%
47%
63%
32%
42%
68%
47%
42%
47%
Bogey
26%
32%
53%
11%
26%
16%
16%
63%
16%
32%
32%
11%
47%
53%
26%
21%
53%
26%
Double+
0%
21%
11%
16%
11%
11%
26%
0%
11%
11%
16%
16%
5%
5%
0%
0%
5%
11%
Mean95% CI
Mean95% CI
Birdie
21%
5%
0%
11%
5%
5%
11%
5%
16%
Par
53%
42%
37%
63%
58%
68%
47%
32%
58%
Bogey
26%
32%
53%
11%
26%
16%
16%
63%
16%
Double+
0%
21%
11%
16%
11%
11%
26%
0%
11%
Mean95% CI
Vs. Hole Profile
Score countAll-time trendLast 12m trend
Par 4
300 scoresAvg. +0.37 / hole+0.22 / 50 yd
Par 5
120 scoresAvg. +0.19 / hole+0.28 / 50 yd
Records
Total Rounds
574
Since Apr 2015
Low Index
1.1
Aug 18, 2025
High Index
20.9
Aug 5, 2005
Low 18H · Rating ≥72
71
2 tied rounds · Latest Jul 2026
High 18H
95
Dec 2019
Low Diff
+2.6
Jul 2025
High Diff
19.6
Mar 2018
Most Birdie+ · 18H
8
Sep 2021
Least Bogey+ · 18H
3
2 tied rounds · Latest Sep 2026
Least Double+ · 18H
0
7 tied rounds · Latest Sep 2026
Best Rounds
| Date | Score | Diff | HI | ΔHI | Qual. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7/25 | 72 | +2.6 | 3.1 | -0.90 | 0.3%Legacy |
| 4/24 | 73 | +0.3 | 4.2 | -0.72 | 0.8%Legacy |
| 7/17 | 74 | 1.5 | 6.1 | -0.74 | 0.9%Legacy |
| 12/19 | 75 | 1.2 | 5.6 | -0.66 | 1.0%Excellent |
| 12/17 | 72 | +1.2 | 2.9 | -0.34 | 1.1%Excellent |
| 7/26 | 71 | +0.2 | 3.8 | -0.38 | 1.3%Excellent |
| 12/16 | 72 | 1.1 | 5.0 | -0.85 | 1.4%Excellent |
| 8/22 | 72 | +1.8 | 2.0 | -0.70 | 1.4%Excellent |
| 10/15 | 75 | 2.6 | 6.5 | -0.60 | 1.6%Excellent |
| 8/20 | 71 | +1.0 | 2.6 | -0.52 | 1.6%Excellent |
| Date | Score | Diff | HI | ΔHI | Qual. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8/25 | 73 | +1.8 | 1.7 | -0.61 | 1.8%Excellent |
| 12/18 | 72 | 1.3 | 4.8 | -0.65 | 1.9%Excellent |
| 4/21 | 74 | +0.2 | 3.2 | -0.30 | 2.0%Excellent |
| 4/19 | 74 | 0.8 | 4.0 | -0.68 | 2.3%Excellent |
| 12/15 | 75 | 2.6 | 5.9 | -0.60 | 2.5%Excellent |
| 4/16 | 74 | 2.2 | 5.2 | -0.64 | 2.9%Excellent |
| 8/26 | 75 | +0.2 | 2.6 | -0.52 | 3.1%Excellent |
| 5/23 | 78 | 3.0 | 5.9 | -0.64 | 3.2%Excellent |
| 6/21 | 72 | +0.2 | 2.5 | -0.50 | 3.2%Excellent |
| 2/22 | 72 | 0.2 | 2.9 | -0.58 | 3.3%Excellent |
20 best · ranked by lowest quality probability